Short post here, but reading between the lines, I’m getting the feeling that the pro-Rights people win, but with an interpretation that’s halfway between what the Bill of Rights really means and what Justice Scalia wants it to say.
Anyway, make sure you check out Laurel’s lol-speakage interpretation.
I haven’t been following this case as closely as perhaps I should, but since I just heard the first little peep on the subject from the legacy media this AM, I thought I’d comment.
Heller asked and answered the question of whether or not the Second Amendment to the Constitution was an individual right, and to a lesser extent whether the Bill of Rights actually applies to the special magic place that is the District of Columbia.
The big question in McDonald is where or not the Bill of Rights applies to the states.
Yup, it’s come down to that. Went all the way to the supremes, too.
original title:
D.C. Snowstorm: How Global Warming Makes Blizzards Worse
stealthy re-spin title after they make themselves the laughing stock:
Another Blizzard: What Happened to Global Warming?
Guys, your preconceived notions on man-made climate change and your unethical web 2.0 publishing standards are showing.
The scene: Yesterday just after the last bit of the 25″ snowstorm. I’m snowed in from the record snowfall. I decide to walk out to the main road and assess the snowpocalypse.
Most of the walk is pretty easy, there’s about a foot of snow on the local streets thanks to the efforts of a private-hired company. The last 100 feet on a footpath was through knee-high snow.
I walked out to the main road. There was about 4 inches of packed down powder, with the remainder ploughed aside and no one around as far as I could see.
A few minutes later I see a SUV coming and I promptly got off to the side (mostly because I didn’t want to be anywhere near anyone obviously insane). Watching from behind the well packed snow berm, he drives by and holds up a 1/2 empty bottle of Miller High Life.
Desperate measures for desperate times, I suppose.
or the Fiendish Fluoridators, or the New Weird Odor, or the orbital mind control lasers. Instead, well…
The government has your baby’s DNA
…
It’s simple, the pediatrician answered: Newborn babies in the United States are routinely screened for a panel of genetic diseases. Since the testing is mandated by the government, it’s often done without the parents’ consent, according to Brad Therrell, director of the National Newborn Screening & Genetics Resource Center.
In many states, such as Florida, where Isabel was born, babies’ DNA is stored indefinitely, according to the resource center.
…
I don’t even know what to write here, this is wrong on so many levels. Due Process? Medical Privacy? Secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects?
And to think we’re making such a stink over REAL ID. At least our future leaders will have all the tools they need to find themselves a good organ donor match, eh?
Update: a little quick research on Govtrack.us: S. 1858:
Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act of 2007. Totally under the radar for me. It looks like it passed by a voice vote in the House and it passed the Senate by Unanimous Consent, so ironically, no public records of the vote were kept.
