Standard Mischief

Archive for October, 2007

I need to read more lefty blogs

Well, it seems those Democrats – you know the party that blasted Bush and Co. over the warrantless wiretaps, the domestic spying program and the perpetual PATRIOT Act abuses – is leaning towards giving all those telco companies (Verizon, Quest, and others) retroactive immunity for any crimes that they committed while they were busy rolling over, selling out, and sucking up taxpayer mega-bucks.

I sure as hell know how I feel about it, but to broaden my perspective on issues, I try to read the writings of people I don’t generally agree with. Due to a number of circumstances, however, I don’t really have a well stocked blog reading list. Going into much detail on my reading requirements would be off-topic, I will state that the prerequisites include allowing pseudonymous comments without logins, comments appearing right away, (instead of waiting for approval from the owner), so that there could be a conversation among readers instead of just between the reader and blogger, and a writer that understands the difference between a troll and a person whom they don’t agree with.

Lean Left is on that list, but they have been silent on the issue. I guess I could search Technorati, but that’s not a very good way to separate the wheat from the chaff.

Over on Daily Kos someone whom I’ve never heard of manages to say “Telco immunity” without saying “Democrats”.

There’s some interesting graphs by Ryan Singel over at Threat Level.

I’m actively soliciting reading suggestions.

2007-10-21 00:01 by Standard Mischief, Filed under:deranged rants     No Comments

LOLcat creators, start your photoshopping…

Found via Blogs Now, this looks like an Ocelot house cat. S/he’s doing various cat thingys, like eating a chicken or playing with a squeeze toy that looks like a grenade. (Update: instead, this is likely a Fishing Cat, from Southeast Asia, as a pet)

It looks like the page is in Russian, so I can’t give you much else. One photo is borderline NSFW. Here’s a thumbnail:

ocelot looking cat eating a chicken

Site is here.

We don’t actually stoop as low as to make lolcats here at Standard Mischief blog, but that’s just because we’re not clever enough to add the white impact font letters with the black border in Gimp.

Prediction: < 24 hours.

Update in less than 24 hours: Probably the same cat, but a different photo than the spread I linked to. On Flickr.

2007-10-20 22:13 by Standard Mischief, Filed under:found object     No Comments

Mojo Nixon & Skid Roper “Elvis Is Everywhere”

Posted solely because it’s been stuck in my head all weekend.

Mojo is the King of Psychobilly.

Mojo Nixon & Skid Roper “Elvis Is Everywhere” 3:42 min.

This is a picture from the linked video
Click here to view the video in a pop-up, resizable window | Direct link

2007-10-15 12:01 by Standard Mischief, Filed under:found object     No Comments

Kate Middleton goes hunting, and I critique the press and PETA

Kate Middleton goes hunting, and while we always avoid the People Magazine angle at the Standard Mischief blog, this time it’s relevant to the topic at hand.

Kate Middleton is entangled with the Royal Family in England. Go click on the Wikipedia link if you want more info. She goes hunting, and the media reports this and PETA (no, not this one) has a cow over it.

Photo of Kate Middleton shooting a scoped, deadly, silenced sniper-style precision instrument of death.
(clickable photo, although the pop-up is not much bigger. Can you see the “can” on the end of the muzzle in this picture?)

Of course, we bloggers never get tired of ripping the media to shreads, having a chance to bash PETA is just icing on the cake.

First I’ll take a jab at the AP. Teh Royals ain’t big news over here, (thank goodness), but the AP just happens to cover the story. What I found really odd is while they describe the photos in detail, they didn’t bother to show any of them.

LONDON (AP) — Photographs published Sunday of Prince William’s girlfriend Kate Middleton, clad in khaki on a Scottish hunting trip, have rekindled speculation that the pair will soon announce their engagement.

British Sunday newspapers ran pictures showing Middleton, 25, on a stag hunting expedition at the royal family’s Balmoral estate alongside William’s father, Prince Charles.

One shows Middleton, in jeans and a camouflage jacket, lying on her stomach as she lines up her rifle for a shot, reportedly at a practice target.

Although there’s no grand conspiracy, perhaps it’s not to far off to suggest that the American press do not want to present “silencers” being used in a helpful, practical manner? There’s no sensible reason why we shouldn’t allow the use of these firearms mufflers to reduce the level of objectionable noise in hunting lands located near residential areas. Doubly so as the noise of firearms is used as a stand-in argument against Sunday hunting here in Maryland (originally it was a blue law).

Anyway, here’s the source of the above photo, the Daily Mail, a UK site.

But she was photographed practising with a formidable bolt-action hunting rifle watched by Prince Charles and two ghillies before heading off into Highlands.

Heh. In the US, she’d be practicing with a “deadly scoped sniper’s rifle.”

As she lay prone in the heather with her rifle, which had been fitted with telescopic sights and a silencer to allow her to shoot a stag a mile off, she appeared completely at ease as Charles’s ghillies talked her through the firing procedure.

(emphasis mine) Well, they sure blew it there. Although even a sub-sonic round (and it has to be low velocity, below the speed of sound or the silencer is worthless) can travel over a mile, 1,760 yards is far, far out of the effective range of the rifle. I’d be surprised if she took a shot past 100 yards on her first time out.

According to the British Association for Shooting and Conservation, deer can cause considerable damage to farm and timber crops if their numbers exceed the available food supply in their woodland or hill habitat.

To reduce such damage and to ensure that the population remains balanced and healthy, deer stalkers use rifles to cull individual animals.

It’s only two paragraphs near the end, but I’d love to see a statement like that (at the very least) end up in our local press. Instead, I’d expect something like this:

Last night a spokesman for the League Against Cruel Sports lambasted Miss Middleton for taking part in the shoot.

“Killing deer for a sport is a horrible pastime. It’s very sad that she has chosen to participate in this cruel sport.

“It’s hardly a setting a good role model for young women, killing animals and I can’t see that this will do her reputation any good whatsoever,” he said.

and

“It is shocking and abhorrent that she is engaging in blood sports.

“Kate is obviously trying to endear herself to the Royal Family and her decision will do her no favours whatsoever,” said a spokesman for campaign group People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA).

“It wasn’t so long ago when she was pictured wearing a fur hat which caused a public outcry and now she is endorsing blood sports.

“The vast majority of the public will be disgusted by these images.

more

Anti blood sports campaigners insist, however, that the chances of a hunter – especially an inexperienced one – failing to kill an animal instantly, leaving it in enormous distress and pain, is high.

Yup, it’s far better, according to PETA, to let the deer herd grow out of control. Then commuters like me can hit and cripple the deer, causing a slow and painful death and quite a bit of car damage too.

So here’s the rundown of ideas I heard from the PETA crowd, and why their “solutions” are expensive and won’t work.

  1. Fencing. The theory is that you can reduce car-deer impacts with a barrier. The facts are that to fence out deer properly, you need 3 rows of fencing. Besides the expense of installing 12 foot high fences everywhere, aren’t the PETA people against zoos anyway? Even de facto ones?
  2. Deer contraceptive. Some kind of injection might work, but you’d have to catch the deer before you gave the injection. Then you would also need to tag the deer so that if it was successfully hunted, the owner would not attempt to eat the tanted meat. Then, of course, you would need to do all that catch and release stuff over again the next year.
  3. Relocation. I suppose they would try to live-trap again and truck them away. Well, the reason the deer around here are such a problem is that there are a lot in the area due to the abundant habitat and very little hunting pressure. Deer have legs and would just migrate back into the area

I don’t want to come off as anti-vegan. Really, I could care less what you chose to put in your mouth, as long as your not thinking that you have the right to dictate to me what I’m allowed to stick in mine. Although I know that not everyone is willing to support hunting, at least recognize that hunting is really the only practical, cost effective way to manage wildlife and stop putting up roadblocks to the practice.

I should also stick in a link somewhere to the PETA people getting caught killing pets, but I’ll just let you google that up by yourself.

2007-10-15 09:00 by Standard Mischief, Filed under:deranged rants     5 Comments

I got away cheap, or gonzo auto bodywork for dummies

I did the preliminary repair work myself on my car for the past week’s venison collision.

Photo of results of an impact with a deer.
(clickable photo)

At the first junkyard automobile recycling center, the pickings were slim. I scored an intact passenger’s side headlight with a broken aiming hardware. I bought it anyway because then I would be able to drive at night with two headlights, instead of being “revenue enhancement fodder” for the county’s finest. I figured that I’d just cable-tie the thing in there roughly aimed the proper way and look for a better one. Meanwhile, I’d still be able to drive past dark.

At the second junkyard automobile recycling center, I found a hood, a intact headlight, and an intact side marker light. I had already determined that the passenger’s side fender was salvageable and there was almost no damage to the front bumper.

I installed the hood first, as it made a reference for the rest of the front-end. I would have to get the hood latch lined up properly and the hood gave me a good target. Then I did a little frame straightening with a borrowed hydraulic bodywork tool and the BFH. I only needed to fix the front-end and hood-latch area, wheel alignment was not affected. Then the headlights and such just bolted in. No pictures, I was too busy. All around I think I spent 25 hours or so shopping and beating panels.

Costs:
first (broken) headlight $23
Second headlight $23
side marker light $8
hood $42

Total ~$96

If the prices seem cheap, they are. It helps much if you go to a “u-pick it, u-pull it” type of junkyard. It also helps if you have an old enough and common enough car such that they end up getting to the yard in the first place, unstripped.

I’ve still got to attach the front grill, and I’ve got to paint that new hood, but at least I’ll not be meeting officer friendly.

Insurance? Well, it’s an old enough vehicle that I don’t keep comprehensive coverage on it. It’s a personal gamble that I’ve won already many times before. I’ve already had this car for two years or so and saved more than this repair in insurance payments even counting in my labor.

2007-10-08 10:00 by Standard Mischief, Filed under:reassembly is the reverse of removal     2 Comments
current.png

Powered by WordPress , Theme Ported to Wordpress by Liu Xun. Original Design by Cathayan