<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Standard Mischief</title>
	<atom:link href="http://standardmischief.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://standardmischief.com/blog</link>
	<description>Life. Liberty. Pursuit of Happiness.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 07:22:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>McDonald: let&#8217;s summarize the oral arguments</title>
		<link>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/03/03/mcdonald-lets-summarize-the-oral-arguments/</link>
		<comments>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/03/03/mcdonald-lets-summarize-the-oral-arguments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Standard Mischief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[deranged rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standardmischief.com/blog/?p=928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Short post here, but reading between the lines, I&#8217;m getting the feeling that the pro-Rights people win, but with an interpretation that&#8217;s halfway between what the Bill of Rights really means and what Justice Scalia wants it to say. 
Anyway, make sure you check out Laurel&#8217;s lol-speakage interpretation.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short post here, but reading between the lines, I&#8217;m getting the feeling that the pro-Rights people win, but with an interpretation that&#8217;s halfway between what the Bill of Rights really means and what Justice Scalia wants it to say. </p>
<p>Anyway, make sure you check out <a href="http://www.politicsgunsandbeer.com/2010/03/02/my-summary-of-the-oral-arguments/">Laurel&#8217;s lol-speakage interpretation.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/03/03/mcdonald-lets-summarize-the-oral-arguments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McDonald: Big day at the supremes today</title>
		<link>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/03/02/mcdonald-big-day-a-the-supremes-today/</link>
		<comments>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/03/02/mcdonald-big-day-a-the-supremes-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Standard Mischief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[deranged rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standardmischief.com/blog/?p=921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t been following this case as closely as perhaps I should, but since I just heard the first little peep on the subject from the legacy media this AM, I thought I&#8217;d comment.
Heller asked and answered the question of whether or not the Second Amendment to the Constitution was an individual right, and to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t been following this case as closely as perhaps I should, but since I just heard the first little peep on the subject from the legacy media this AM, I thought I&#8217;d comment.</p>
<p><em>Heller</em> asked and answered the question of whether or not the Second Amendment to the Constitution was an individual right, and to a lesser extent whether the Bill of Rights actually <em>applies</em> to the special magic place that is the District of Columbia.</p>
<p>The big question in McDonald is where or not the Bill of Rights applies to the<em> states.</em> </p>
<p>Yup, it&#8217;s come down to that. Went all the way to the supremes, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/03/02/mcdonald-big-day-a-the-supremes-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TIME: weather is not climate unless we say so</title>
		<link>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/02/11/time-weather-is-not-climate-unless-we-say-so/</link>
		<comments>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/02/11/time-weather-is-not-climate-unless-we-say-so/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Standard Mischief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[deranged rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standardmischief.com/blog/?p=911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[original title: 
D.C. Snowstorm: How Global Warming Makes Blizzards Worse
stealthy re-spin title after they make themselves the laughing stock: 
Another Blizzard: What Happened to Global Warming?
Guys, your preconceived notions on man-made climate change and your unethical web 2.0 publishing standards are showing. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>original title: </p>
<p><strong>D.C. Snowstorm: How Global Warming Makes Blizzards Worse</strong></p>
<p>stealthy re-spin title after they make themselves the laughing stock: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1962294,00.html">Another Blizzard: What Happened to Global Warming?</a></p>
<p>Guys, your preconceived notions on man-made climate change and your unethical web 2.0 publishing standards are showing. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/02/11/time-weather-is-not-climate-unless-we-say-so/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>snowpocalypse 2010: Desperate measures for desperate times</title>
		<link>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/02/07/snowpocalypse-2010-desperate-measures-for-desperate-times/</link>
		<comments>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/02/07/snowpocalypse-2010-desperate-measures-for-desperate-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Standard Mischief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[deranged rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standardmischief.com/blog/?p=900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The scene: Yesterday just after the last bit of the 25&#8243; snowstorm. I&#8217;m snowed in from the record snowfall. I decide to walk out to the main road and assess the snowpocalypse.
Most of the walk is pretty easy, there&#8217;s about a foot of snow on the local streets thanks to the efforts of a private-hired [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The scene: Yesterday just after the last bit of the 25&#8243; snowstorm. I&#8217;m snowed in from the record snowfall. I decide to walk out to the main road and assess the snowpocalypse.</p>
<p>Most of the walk is pretty easy, there&#8217;s about a foot of snow on the local streets thanks to the efforts of a private-hired company. The last 100 feet on a footpath was through knee-high snow. </p>
<p>I walked out to the main road. There was about 4 inches of packed down powder, with the remainder ploughed aside and no one around as far as I could see. </p>
<p>A few minutes later I see a SUV coming and I promptly got off to the side (mostly because I didn&#8217;t want to be anywhere near anyone obviously insane). Watching from behind the well packed snow berm, he drives by and holds up a 1/2 empty bottle of Miller High Life. </p>
<p>Desperate measures for desperate times, I suppose. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/02/07/snowpocalypse-2010-desperate-measures-for-desperate-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I am so tempted to say something about ZOG, or dark green helicopters, or boxcars&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/02/05/i-am-so-tempted-to-say-something-about-zog-or-dark-green-helicopters-or-boxcars/</link>
		<comments>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/02/05/i-am-so-tempted-to-say-something-about-zog-or-dark-green-helicopters-or-boxcars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 04:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Standard Mischief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[deranged rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standardmischief.com/blog/?p=884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[or the Fiendish Fluoridators,  or the New Weird Odor, or the orbital mind control lasers. Instead, well&#8230;

The government has your baby&#8217;s DNA 
&#8230;
It&#8217;s simple, the pediatrician answered: Newborn babies in the United States are routinely screened for a panel of genetic diseases. Since the testing is mandated by the government, it&#8217;s often done without [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or the Fiendish Fluoridators,  or the New Weird Odor, or the orbital mind control lasers. Instead, well&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>
<strong><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/04/baby.dna.government/index.html">The government has your baby&#8217;s DNA</a></strong> </p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s simple, the pediatrician answered: Newborn babies in the United States are routinely screened for a panel of genetic diseases. Since the testing is mandated by the government, it&#8217;s often done without the parents&#8217; consent, according to Brad Therrell, director of the National Newborn Screening &#038; Genetics Resource Center.</p>
<p>In many states, such as Florida, where Isabel was born, babies&#8217; DNA is stored indefinitely, according to the resource center.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t even know what to write here, this is wrong on so many levels. Due Process? Medical Privacy? Secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects?</p>
<p>And to think we&#8217;re making such a stink over REAL ID. At least our future leaders will have all the tools they need to find themselves a good organ donor match, eh? </p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> a little quick research on Govtrack.us: S. 1858:<br />
<a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-1858">Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act of 2007.</a> Totally under the radar for me. It looks like it passed by a voice vote in the House and it passed the Senate by Unanimous Consent, so ironically, no public records of the vote were kept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/02/05/i-am-so-tempted-to-say-something-about-zog-or-dark-green-helicopters-or-boxcars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Be prepared to shelter in place for 3-5 days&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/02/04/be-prepared-to-shelter-in-place-for-3-5-days/</link>
		<comments>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/02/04/be-prepared-to-shelter-in-place-for-3-5-days/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Standard Mischief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[deranged rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standardmischief.com/blog/?p=881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s the news from Arlington county, Virginia, in an email alert that went out yesterday right after 7 PM. That &#8220;permalink&#8221; doesn&#8217;t seem too permanent, so I&#8217;ll toss the full text at the bottom of the post. 
Noted because of the &#8220;Mainstreaming of Survivalism&#8220;.
Edited to add: I almost forgot that they were talking on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the news from Arlington county, Virginia, in an <a href="https://www.arlingtonalert.com/latest.php#5790">email alert that went out yesterday right after 7 PM.</a> That &#8220;permalink&#8221; doesn&#8217;t seem too permanent, so I&#8217;ll toss the full text at the bottom of the post. </p>
<p>Noted because of the &#8220;<a href="http://www.scroogle.org/cgi-bin/nbbw.cgi?Gw=mainstreaming+of+survivalism&#038;n=5">Mainstreaming of Survivalism</a>&#8220;.</p>
<p><strong>Edited to add:</strong> I almost forgot that they were talking on the radio today about having 3 to five days of <em>&#8220;non-perishable food&#8221;</em>.  Now that&#8217;s real good advice to follow 365 days of the year, but they seem to be forgetting about the huge walk-in freezer I happen to have in my back yard.  Trust me, If I lose power, (admittedly a possibility),  keeping the contents of my fridge from spoiling will not be an issue. (I even have cleaning out the freezer on my todo list this weekend.)</p>
<blockquote><p>02/03/10 19:06	Another severe winter storm, with near blizzard conditions, is forecast to hit Arlington Fri., Feb. 5 through Sat., Feb. 6. Be prepared to shelter in place for 3 to 5 days . Please stay off the roads. Snow crews will plow primary and secondary roads first for emergency vehicles. After severe storms (more than 10”), it may take 36-48 hours after the snow stops before County plows can get to residential streets. Removal and treatment may take several days. For cancellations, more info, tips, visit the County Website (http://www.arlingtonva.us/portals/topics/TopicsWeatherWinter.aspx) </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/02/04/be-prepared-to-shelter-in-place-for-3-5-days/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The forecast was for a &#8220;dusting&#8221; to one inch</title>
		<link>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/01/30/the-forecast-was-for-a-dusting-to-one-inch/</link>
		<comments>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/01/30/the-forecast-was-for-a-dusting-to-one-inch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 02:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Standard Mischief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[deranged rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bread toilet-paper milk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/01/30/the-forcast-was-for-a-dusting-to-one-inch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But what we got was an honest 5 inches of the lightest, fluffiest snow I&#8217;ve seen in a decade. 
Weather forecasters: well at least they&#8217;re pretty good at telling me when the precipitation will start, give or take six hours or so, but I wish they would remind me by ending the forecast with &#8220;&#8230;no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But what we got was an honest 5 inches of the lightest, fluffiest snow I&#8217;ve seen in a decade. </p>
<p>Weather forecasters: well at least they&#8217;re pretty good at telling me when the precipitation will start, give or take six hours or so, but I wish they would remind me by ending the forecast with &#8220;&#8230;no more than an inch this time around, but what the heck do we know?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/01/30/the-forecast-was-for-a-dusting-to-one-inch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ready to carpet bomb your congress-critters with faxes?</title>
		<link>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/01/19/ready-to-carpet-bomb-your-congress-critters-with-faxes/</link>
		<comments>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/01/19/ready-to-carpet-bomb-your-congress-critters-with-faxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Standard Mischief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[deranged rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any d]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standardmischief.com/blog/?p=875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Say, maybe tomorrow morning? I&#8217;ll bet they&#8217;ll still be shell shocked over the Brown victory.
You don&#8217;t want to call or email, that&#8217;s too easy. And you don&#8217;t want to mail anything, It&#8217;ll never get through the anti-anthrax screening on time. Faxes are best.
I haven&#8217;t settled on my exact wording, but I will be saying something [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say, maybe tomorrow morning? I&#8217;ll bet they&#8217;ll still be shell shocked over the Brown victory.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t want to call or email, that&#8217;s too easy. And you don&#8217;t want to mail anything, It&#8217;ll never get through the anti-anthrax screening on time. Faxes are best.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t settled on my exact wording, but I will be saying something about how disappointed I am about the backroom wheeling and dealing that&#8217;s not on c-span as promised. Oh and I won&#8217;t be mentioning the election results in Massachusetts, but I will capitalize on the timing. I&#8217;ll suggest scuttling the whole thing because we&#8217;ve strayed too far from the ideal bill. I&#8217;ll remind them that mid-terms are right around the corner and that I&#8217;m not interested in a bill that spends a lot of money we still don&#8217;t have and fails to do almost anything to control costs, like allowing overseas prescription drugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/01/19/ready-to-carpet-bomb-your-congress-critters-with-faxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>errors in the questions pool for the General Amateur Radio Licence exam</title>
		<link>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/01/17/errors-in-the-questions-pool-for-the-general-amateur-radio-licence-exam/</link>
		<comments>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/01/17/errors-in-the-questions-pool-for-the-general-amateur-radio-licence-exam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 03:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Standard Mischief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[deranged rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standardmischief.com/blog/?p=858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you might guess, I&#8217;m studying for the exam now. It&#8217;s a boring exercise in memorization and regurgitation, something I was never much good at. I do have a solid grasp of electronics theory and radio propagation, so all I have to do is memorize a bunch of crap about where RTTY is in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you might guess, I&#8217;m studying for the exam now. It&#8217;s a boring exercise in memorization and regurgitation, something I was never much good at. I do have a solid grasp of electronics theory and radio propagation, so all I have to do is memorize a bunch of crap about where RTTY is in the band plan and what ending a message in SK means. </p>
<p>Just for the heck of it I thought I&#8217;d point out a few errors I&#8217;ve found in the pool.</p>
<blockquote><p>G4D08. Which of the following connectors would be a good choice for a serial data port?<br />
 A. PL-259<br />
 B. Type N<br />
 C. Type SMA<br />
 <strong>D. DB-9</strong> </p></blockquote>
<p>They say the right answer is a DB-9, but there really isn&#8217;t a connector called that (at least in common use).  Your useless bit of trivia for the day is that the &#8220;B&#8221; stands for the size of the connector, and a <a href="http://www.nullmodem.com/DB-9.htm">nine pin D-shaped connector is actually called a DE-9 connector. </a></p>
<blockquote><p>G6B02. What are the two major ratings that must not be exceeded for silicon-diode rectifiers?<br />
Select	Answer<br />
A	Peak load impedance; peak voltage<br />
B	Capacitive reactance; avalanche voltage<br />
C	Average power; average voltage<br />
<strong>D	Peak inverse voltage; average forward current</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>While the average forward current part is correct, you can go over the peek inverse voltage as long as the current rating of the diode is not exceeded.  I&#8217;m being persnickety here because usually if you do exceed that reverse voltage, the &#8220;avalanche effect&#8221; virtually assures the current level will spike. See the w&#8217;pedia article for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avalanche_diode">Avalanche diode</a> where this effect is utilized.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve searched around and found a list or two of questions that have been withdrawn because of errors already. Neither of these two questions are on those lists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2010/01/17/errors-in-the-questions-pool-for-the-general-amateur-radio-licence-exam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote of the day  &#8211; Climate Fraud edition</title>
		<link>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2009/12/24/quote-of-the-day-climate-fraud-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2009/12/24/quote-of-the-day-climate-fraud-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 02:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Standard Mischief</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[deranged rants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://standardmischief.com/blog/?p=853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Savor the irony. Reds pretending to be green have been scuppered by mercantilists pretending to be Reds. OK, that’s oversimplifying grossly; the Chinese have managed to retain most of the worst traits of communism on their capitalist road, and not all the heavies in the AGW crowd are scheming socialists. It’s still true enough to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=1532"><br />
<blockquote>Savor the irony. Reds pretending to be green have been scuppered by mercantilists pretending to be Reds. OK, that’s oversimplifying grossly; the Chinese have managed to retain most of the worst traits of communism on their capitalist road, and not all the heavies in the AGW crowd are scheming socialists. It’s still true enough to be funny.</p></blockquote>
<p></a></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t confirm the Chinese scuttled this barge, but it makes sense if this time around they were expected to kick themselves in the nuts, rather than just watch the US do it to themselves, like we did with Kyoto and  Montreal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://standardmischief.com/blog/2009/12/24/quote-of-the-day-climate-fraud-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
